Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
Group Info Group Founded 12 Years ago Statistics 886 Members
442,103 Pageviews1,437 Watchers

Gallery Folders

Essential Reading
2010 Avatar Designs
Wallpapers
Flags

Random from Favourites

Central Committee of the CPDA

Communist Party of DeviantART
Central Executive Committee and Commissariats


:iconthe-necromancer: General Secretary of the CPDA
:iconknofear: Commissar of Theory and Ideology
:iconthe-laughing-rabbit:Commissar of External Affairs
:iconhernz4795: Commissar of Internal Affairs
:iconrenjikuchiki1: Commissar of Literary Affairs
:iconparty9999999: Commissar of Visual Arts
:iconfatal-nostalgia: Commissar of Environmental Affairs
:iconvelikorossiya: Commissar of the Treasury
(Point donations can be made here: velikorossiya.deviantart.com/?… )


Communist Party of DeviantART Deputy Commissars
:iconace99129: Deputy Commissar of Visual Arts
:iconcomradenovember: Deputy Commissar of External Affairs
:iconkiev-45: Deputy Commissar of Theory and Ideology
:iconfrenzywolf: Deputy Commissar of External Affairs
:icondarkzaitzev: Deputy Commissar of Literary Affairs
:icondeathlesslegends13: Deputy Commissar of Literary Affairs
:iconrenegadeofpeace: Former Commissar, Observer
:icondomain-of-the-public: Former Commissar, Observer
:iconnurizin: Former Commissar, Observer
:iconbttlrp: Observer


The Red Star Vanguard Staff

:iconknofear:Chief Editor
:iconthe-necromancer:Co-Founder, Columnist
:iconfatal-nostalgia:Co-Founder, Columnist
:icondeathlesslegends13:Former Chief Editor, Columnist
:iconkcammy:Columnist
:iconpopov89:Columnist

CommunismDA YouTube Staff

:iconpkbchaz: Channel Producer

Official Anthem of the CPDA: The Internationale

Projects:

Fulfilling the CPDA's One Year Plan. Details are provided here: communism.deviantart.com/journ…
Dear comrades of the CPDA,

While not strictly Fascist, National Bolshevism has it's roots in some of the philosophical movements of Great War Germany, specifically the writings of Ernst Niekisch and Ernst Jünger. It would later be inspired and partially embodied by the 1930s National Socialist Combat Movement headed by Nazis Hermann Ehrhardt, Otto Strasser, and Walther Stennes.

While this movement remained under high ridicule during Lenin's government, during the Stalin period some members of the National Bolshevist movement were allowed breathing room, such as B.D. Grekov's National Bolshevik school of historiography and the Smenovekhovtsi. Of course, National Bolshevism is but one form of the so-called "right wing" of Socialist thought. As noted above, other proponents of such "Conservative Socialism" included many Nazis, Fascists, and ultra Nationalists. In Russia, some even sought the restoration of the monarchy during the Civil War.

The National Bolshevik Party still exists within the Russian Federation today, taking stands against the government of Mr. Putin. During the trial of despised Serbian war criminal Ratko Mladić, the NBP attacked the Serbian Embassy in Moscow to demonstrate their solidarity with Mladić. The modern concepts of the NBP are largely Eurasianist in nature, seeking to create a Greater Russia out of Asian territories lost with the collapse of the USSR and the unification of Belarus with Russia. The retaking of Crimea is also in line with National Bolshevist ideals. While not in agreement with Putin's own visions of a Eurasian Union, it is still another form of empire, with many romanticizing the days of the Romanovs and the Czarist Empire.

Suffice it to say, such philosophies as National Bolshevism are in stark contradiction to Marxist thought and threaten the true internationalist spirit of Communism. As the National Bolshevist movement has it's roots with the Fascist and Nazi movements of Italy and Germany, it is an inherently dangerous form of politic. As is well known, many comrades perished at the hands of Fascists before and during the Second World War. Not just in the military action, but through the persecution of the SS, Gestapo, and other hated Fascist organizations of terror.

Admiration or support of Fascist, Nazi, or National Bolshevist tendencies is not tolerated by the CPDA, as such tendencies are the enemy of all working peoples. In our steadfast support of the ANTIFA (Anti-Fascist) cause, it is in our best interests to discuss methods against Fascist tendencies, whether it be in regards to supposed comrades or practical methods in our daily lives. Any CPDA members found to hold such views will face expulsion after proper review.


Anti-Fascist Front by Party9999999

In solidarity,

The-Necromancer
More Journal Entries

Recent Journal Entries

Affiliates

:iconthebolsheviks::iconanti-fascists::iconcontroversyinc::iconcommunism-world::iconussr2-0::iconfistagonunited::iconfreepoetsociety::iconred-army-art::icontrotsky-fans::iconvintage-spirit::iconthesovietarmy::iconthe-da-international::iconanarchist-communist::iconoccupyartists::iconpoliticaldebateclub::iconsocialistrealism::iconpif-gadget::iconww2artists::iconstalins-followers::iconno-more-ignorance::iconpolitically::iconsocialist-anarchists::iconspda::icontheseaswillrunred::iconthe-communist-bloc::icondapoliticalforumclub::iconlgbt-socialist-party::iconlgbt-revolutionaries::iconxcccp::iconanti-nato:

Comments


Add a Comment:
 
:iconvladimirseyer:
Trivia:The Fake Quote"one man's death is a tragedy,millions is a statistics",some claim it was said by Stalin..the quote is similar from Franzosischer Witz by Kurt Tucholsky."The War?i can't find it too terrible!the death of one man:that is a catastrophe.one Hundred thousand deaths:That is a Statistic!"..."One man's death is a tragedy.." is also mentioned in the Book 'The Time of Stalin,Portrait of Tyranny'.
Reply
:iconthe-necromancer:
The-Necromancer Featured By Owner Jun 22, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
It is just as fake a quote as that one attributed to Khrushchev about "The will wake up to find they have Communism."

But, as comrade Lenin once said, a lie told often enough becomes the truth.
Reply
:iconvladimirseyer:
VladimirSeyer Featured By Owner Jun 20, 2014
Yeeesh...i am so sick of people claiming Lenin & Stalin are jews...is Lenin & Stalin looks like Jew.Most of us Communists defies Religion,why should we be Jewish,it's too impossible for Stalin to be a Jew since he demolished all Churches,even though some Religious People in the Soviet union continue to live in towns & cities....Holocaust Deniers are stupid.
Reply
:iconthe-necromancer:
The-Necromancer Featured By Owner Jun 21, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Well, there is somewhat of a distinction to be made when one says "Jew". They could be referring to the spiritual, religious Judaism. Or they could be referring to the cultural, racial identity of being ethnically Jewish. However, as neither Lenin or Stalin were religious or ethnically Jewish, it is more than a bit stupid to say so. Just like alot of people blather on about Marx and Engels being funded and directed by Jews. Absolute nonsense. Now if they said that about Trotsky, that would be partially correct. Trotsky was ethnically Jewish, although he was not religious.

And yes, those who deny the Holocaust are trying to rewrite history. The amount of factual evidence proving beyond doubt that the Third Reich committed mass genocide during World War II is absolutely staggering. How anyone can say it didn't happen is completely insane...
Reply
:iconfranziivonosterreich:
Here is something that I am curious to hear the Marxist opinion on, Distributism. The economic model that presents a third option to Socialism and capitalism.
The basis of Distributism is that all economic control should be in the hands of as many people as possible so that no government or business can exploit the people. It strictly believes in the concept of private property. That is is a God given right to all human beings that they be allowed to possess a plot of land to call their own.
Another tenant of Distributism is that it is largely based on Christian teachings, that we, as children of God ought to take care of each-other. That by enforcing Christian morality into the economy and by putting human dignity first, we can achieve a humane economy. Also, Distributism seeks to replace the unions with a modern style of guilds in which labor and management are components. Distributism believes in class collaboration rather than struggle to achieve social harmony.

So what do you think of this model? I would love to hear feedback
Reply
:iconskargill:
Skargill Featured By Owner Jun 17, 2014  Hobbyist Photographer
"Also, Distributism seeks to replace the unions with a modern style of guilds in which labor and management are components. Distributism believes in class collaboration rather than struggle to achieve social harmony."

So just like classical Fascist economics then, only with an actual God instead of a human leader who is God like. Then again Fascism was originally marketed as a "third way" between Communism and Capitalism and also sought to impose its rigidly defined moral code on its population so not really much difference.
Reply
:iconfranziivonosterreich:
yet Distributism seeks to decentralize economic control as much as possible. And Havign an actual God as the center of this philosophy ids not a bad thing.  The problem with you Marxists and capitalists is that you think that mankind is capable of his own salvation yet if history teaches us anything it is that we are the cause of our own damnation. The only way we can actually achieve salvation is through God and Jesus Christ.
And PS, Thatcher kicked Skargills Ass
Reply
:iconskargill:
Skargill Featured By Owner Jun 18, 2014  Hobbyist Photographer
I'm not a Marxist. Also no she didn't kick "Skargills ass" there is no one by that name nor is my username a refernce to Arthur Scargill.

Your just a fundamentalist nutter preaching Fascism only you don't have the courage to admit that hence the poor attempt at deception.

PS, Thatcher was a Capitalist who despised attempts to impose morality on individuals, she'd be just as opposed to you as she was to Karl Marx.
Reply
(1 Reply)
:icondeathlesslegends13:
DeathlessLegends13 Featured By Owner Jun 17, 2014  Student Writer
The problem is why would management and labor need to form a guild if they each have their own plot of land. They would be too busy working their own plot for their to be any organization, any management or additional labor. the only case that would make sense is if they were capable of merging land collectively, but then being managed, which leads to the creation of the classes in the first place. 

Second issue is how is this going to be implemented? even if you get people to support the idea you are going to have a hard time getting the Capitalists to support. Their entire system is based on them having ownership of production, so a distributist system is not going to work for them. They Struggled for years to ensure that they dominate over the workers, ensuring Unions and other worker organizations do not succeed. Most of the Time they do so with the support of the government. So your choice is limited, like ours, to revolution. But if you succeed, how will the system be defended? How will you prevent land from being merged through consent, and then dominated after the fact? 

lastly its an idea that is purely academic and doesn't have a basis of support amongst the people. Its odd, its complicated and its a bit unnatural. Even socialism and Communism makes more sense to people, even if they disagree with how it was implemented.

So I will use the common critique of Communism (which i disagree with) on Distributism. "Sounds good on paper, but won't work in real life"
Reply
:iconfranziivonosterreich:
Well if the economy is "distributed" then there is no real need for a union or guild anyways and that is kind of the ideal.
For the second question, I view distributism as not an end but means to a better end. elements of Distributism can be implemented. and have been such as anti trust laws. As for destroying the capitalist system, revolution might work but, I would prefer to implement distributism peacefully, i suppose If one could gain political control of a state and could break the power of special interests you could just pass the required legislation such as outlawing corporate mergers, breaking up massive corporations and such. And i think it would be very popular among the people as it would actually see the people have control lover the economy not big business or the government.
Reply
:iconthe-necromancer:
The-Necromancer Featured By Owner Jun 16, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
In other words, see Christian Communism...
Reply
:iconfranziivonosterreich:
No, not really i suppose its a sort of socialism minus Marxist ideology. Because it doesn't focus on class struggle and overthrowing the bourgeoisie, its more about an economy based on Christian morality. As in, treat others like you want to be treated don;t exploit each other, give to others. Also , Distributism is very family oriented whereas the family not the individual is the basic societal unit. And I know you leftists just hate  traditional families.
Reply
:iconhernz4795:
HERNZ4795 Featured By Owner Jun 19, 2014
Leftist do not hate traditional families. On the other hand you Christians do HATE "non-traditional" families despite that Christ himself condemned hate and bigotry.

Besides... Christian morality is more prudish and hypocrite than any other form of morality, an economy based on that wouldn't be better than economy in the Middle Ages in my opinion.
Reply
(1 Reply)
:icondeathlesslegends13:
DeathlessLegends13 Featured By Owner Jun 17, 2014  Student Writer
Not really, even christian communists don't support private property. Like he said this is an answer against capitalist and Communism, to make a position that will return people to the Catholic faith, instead of to liberal governments or to labour organizations
Reply
:iconthe-necromancer:
The-Necromancer Featured By Owner Jun 17, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
...the emphasis on "God given right" did have me wondering...
Reply
Add a Comment: